英国埃克斯特论文代写:独立于宗教

Keywords:英国埃克斯特论文代写:独立于宗教

最后，他认为我们的道德是独立于宗教的。他说，如果我们认为我们需要一个上帝或一本圣书来道德，那就意味着我们被欺骗了。当我们从一本神圣的书中选择我们觉得合适的时候，我们实际上是在根据我们的理性来决定我们的道德应该是什么。因此，他认为我们首先不需要一本圣经，也不需要上帝。在其他情况下，我们有宗教仅仅是因为害怕上帝或者害怕不去天堂。这些行为首先是不道德的。在辩论过程中，道金斯指出了几个弱点。其中之一就是他不能清楚地表达他的观点。这一点的证据贯穿于整个辩论。在他第一次详细阐述这六篇论文中的任何一篇时，他无法直接表达自己的观点。只有在他的回答中，我们才能更好地理解他想说的话。除了陈述，他在第二篇论文中也表现出了较弱的论点。第二篇论文是“科学支持无神论而不是基督教”。他的论据主要是引用他的话。杰里·科因(Jerry Coyne)的那句话指出，真正的辩论是在理性主义和迷信之间展开的。科学不过是理性主义的一种形式，而宗教则是最常见的迷信。他接下来的论点是关于史蒂芬·杰伊·古尔德的话。如前所述，这段引文指出宗教和科学没有重叠。道金斯解释了他为什么不同意这句话，并谈论了解决问题的科学方法。然而，在第二篇论文中，他没有解释为什么科学支持无神论，也没有解释为什么科学支持无神论。
英国埃克斯特论文代写:独立于宗教
Lastly, he argued that our morality is independent from religion. He states that if we think we require a god or a holy book to be moral, it means that we are deluded. When we pick versus that we feel suitable from a holy book, we are actually deciding on what our morality should be based on our rationality. Thus, he argues that we do not need neither a holy book nor God in the first place. In the other cases, we have a religion only because of the fear of God or the fear of not going to heaven. These acts are not moral in the first place.During the course of the debate, Dawkins showed several weaknesses. Among them is that he cannot convey his point about the thesis clearly. The evidence for this can be seen throughout the entire debate. In his first attempt to elaborate any of the six theses, he could not express his ideas in a straight forward manner. It is only in his reply where we can get a better idea of what he was trying to say.Besides presentation, he also displayed weak arguments in the second thesis. The second thesis was ‘science supports atheism and not Christianity’. His arguments were mainly about the quote given to him. The quote by Jerry Coyne states that the real debate was between rationalism and superstition. Science is but one form of rationalism and religion is the most common superstition. The next part of him argument was about the quote by Steven Jay Gould. As mentioned, the quote states that religion and science do not overlap. Dawkins explains why he disagrees with the quote and talk about the scientific method of solving a problem. However, throughout the second thesis, he did not explain why or how science supports atheism.